Friday, March 4, 2016
Using a MESO to create a summer parenting-time plan
Divorced parents working to create a summer parenting-time schedule for teens should not confuse a MESO for miso. Miso is a delectableJapanese soup made with dashi and regional ingredients. A MESO, in contrast, isn’t delectable--but it is an exceptionally effective negotiation tool.
MESO is an acronym for Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers— a method used by high level negotiators to break impasses, tease out the other party’s interests, and maintain constructive engagement. Here’s how it works:
One party presents two or more options of equal value to themselves: “Here are three different ways we could handle your debt obligations. I’m okay with any one of the three. Which one do you prefer?” The other party then has the opportunity to choose which option he or she favors—and to explain why. Since the party making the offer has already said any one of the choices is acceptable, this may settle the matter—they go forward with the option that the other party favors. In other instances, the one receiving the offer is not ready to accept the option found most preferable (“well, this one is the best of a bad lot”), but their explanation for why that choice is preferable provides valuable insight about their interests and goals. This information can be used, in turn, to create additional options.
A variation of the MESO is an effective strategy for divorced parents who want to involve their teens in summer planning but don’t want to over-empower the teens by letting them dictate the family’s schedule and parenting-time. The process starts with the parents sharing their respective goals and ideas for the summer: vacations, travel, summer camp, athletic practices, band camp. The teens’ ideas should certainly be part of the conversation (“Julie wants to take driver’s education this summer”), but at this stage the discussion and planning is driven by the parents. With the information they’ve collected, the parents create two or more summer schedules; the only criteria is that each parent must agree that all of the proposed schedules are acceptable. Typically, each plan emphasizes different interests. In one case, for example, the parents developed two schedules: one dividing the summer into two equal blocks of time, one with each parent, and the other dividing the summer into short blocks of parenting time, alternating throughout the summer. In another instance, the parents created one schedule that included overnight camp enrollment and another schedule that allowed family travel. Once the parents have developed several mutually acceptable plans, they present the choices to the teen: “Your mother and I have agreed that we can work with any one of these three schedules, which one would you prefer?” The teen then has the chance to indicate which plan is preferable. The parents can move forward with the teen’s preference or use it as the basis for further discussion.
In families with more than one teenager, parents can either present a different set of options to each teen (tailored individually) or present one set of options and ask them to decide amongst themselves which one they prefer.
This approach has several advantages. It reassures the teen that his or her parents can work together and use reasonable compromises to account for everyone’s concerns. Although the teen weighs in with a final choice, decision-making authority remains with the parents – the teen is choosing amongst options created by the parents, not ones of their own making. Furthermore, the process teaches the teens the necessity of making compromises and tradeoffs amongst everyone’s preferences to reach agreements: “You can’t always get what you want.” But by having a decisive say in what is finally chosen, he or she has real involvement in the decision.